Posts Tagged ‘GM’

Report: Chevrolet dealer ready to charge $20,000 over MSRP for Volt… will more follow?

August 2nd, 2010

2011 Chevrolet Volt – Click above for high-res image gallery

Researchers from Edmunds decided to drop their local Chevrolet dealer a line to inquire about staking a claim for one of the first available Volts, and the response was shocking at best and galling at worst. Here’s the email, sans names:

Hello *****

Thank you for your online request, as you know the Volt is going to be a very limited production vehicle for the first 2-3 years. Demand is going to far exceed supply for this vehicle, initially our asking price for the Volt is going to be MSRP plus $20,000, we are expecting only receive 9 Volts all of next year.

I will keep you in my customer base for when the Volt comes out and I will contact you with any information as I receive it. We are taking orders right now for the Volt, if you would like more information, please let me know and I will be more than happy to help you. Thank you.

***** *****, Internet Specialist
******* Chevrolet
********, CA

You read that right. A $20k markup over MSRP for a 2011 Chevrolet Volt.

As Edmunds’ AutoObserver points out, this email exchange took place before General Motors announced its plans to increase Volt production by 50% for 2011, churning out approximately 45,000 units in its first year. But even with that knowledge, would the unnamed dealer still avoid bilking early adopters? We doubt it.

While it’s not clear if any other Chevy dealers plan to follow suit, history would suggest that big markups are likely – the Corvette ZR1 initiated this sort of fervor when it was announced, too. On the flip side of the coin, AO sites a report from GM-Volt.com this past June, in which a GM spokesperson is quoted as saying: “We also aren’t expecting our dealers to overcharge anyone for this vehicle, either, and will monitor the situation closely when we launch,” adding, “we’ll be paying close attention when the vehicle launches and do our best to strongly discourage this kind of behavior, as we always do with any GM-branded vehicle.”

GM is allowing Volt buyers to lease the plug-in hybrid for $350 a month (with a $2,500 down payment) when sales begin later this year, so it strikes us as odd that someone would choose to purchase a Volt outright if the dealer would tack on such an astronomical amount to the MSRP. Then again, there’s the possibility that dealers might only allow purchases, negating the option to lease.

With so much riding on the Volt’s success – from GM’s long-term environmental program to the political pressures over the federal bailout – the General better get its dealers in line post-haste. If not, the fallout has the potential to stymie the Volt’s success before the first owner takes delivery.

[Source: AutoObserver]

Report: Chevrolet dealer ready to charge $20,000 over MSRP for Volt… will more follow? originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:57:00 EST.

Doing the Math on Obama’s Detroit Bailout

August 2nd, 2010

President Obama served up red meat for his hard-core supporters in Detroit yesterday, proclaiming that the government’s bailout of General Motors and Chrysler to be a success. Had he not intervened and invested in the two companies, Obama said, they would have fallen into liquidation and 1.1 million jobs would have evaporated. In the past year, the auto industry has regained 55,000 of the 334,000 jobs lost, he went on. “The fact that we’re standing in this magnificent factory today is a testament to the decisions we made,” Obama said while visiting Chrysler’s Jeep Grand Cherokee plant in Detroit. His comments were aimed clearly at the critics on the other side of the political aisle who opposed the bailout 18 months ago and who still criticize government ownership of GM and Chrysler to this day. » Read more: Doing the Math on Obama’s Detroit Bailout

C/D: Cadillac to get new range-topping rear-wheel drive flagship

June 11th, 2010

According to Car and Driver‘s Jens Meiners, Cadillac is poised to get a new full-size, rear-wheel drive sedan to slot in above the forthcoming XTS – a model that itself will sit above the CTS when it bows to serve as a combined replacement for the STS and DTS.

To hear C/D’s moles tell it, the flagship sedan is still in the early planning stages, but the model is being built at the directive of none other than GM CEO Ed Whitacre. If the rumor is accurate, the forthcoming model is apparently likely to be derived from a stretched Sigma platform, the same architecture that underpins the CTS family. Meiners dismisses thoughts that the car could be built on the much-used Zeta platform that underpins the Chevrolet Camaro, suggesting that it’s too heavy and old to support such a vehicle.

With word that a Lambda-based three-row crossover and the BMW 3-Series fighting ATS are on the way for General Motors‘ Wreath and Crest division, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the boys down at The Tubes have hit the product accelerator pedal for their luxury brand. We just hope that this mystery offering means that Cadillac is finally going to cook up something that looks like 2003′s showstopping Sixteen concept (above), albeit likely in a scaled-down format.

[Source: Car and Driver]

C/D: Cadillac to get new range-topping rear-wheel drive flagship originally appeared on Autoblog on Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:28:00 EST.

C/D: Cadillac to get new range-topping rear-wheel-drive flagship

June 11th, 2010

According to Car and Driver‘s Jens Meiners, Cadillac is poised to get a new full-size, rear-wheel drive sedan to slot in above the forthcoming XTS – a model that itself will sit above the CTS when it bows to serve as a combined replacement for the STS and DTS.

To hear C/D’s moles tell it, the flagship sedan is still in the early planning stages, but the model is being built at the directive of none other than GM CEO Ed Whitacre. If the rumor is accurate, the forthcoming model is apparently likely to be derived from a stretched Sigma platform, the same architecture that underpins the CTS family. Meiners dismisses thoughts that the car could be built on the much-used Zeta platform that underpins the Chevrolet Camaro, suggesting that it’s too heavy and old to support such a vehicle.

With word that a Lambda-based three-row crossover and the BMW 3-Series fighting ATS are on the way for General Motors‘ Wreath and Crest division, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the boys down at The Tubes have hit the product accelerator pedal for their luxury brand. We just hope that this mystery offering means that Cadillac is finally going to cook up something that looks like 2003′s showstopping Sixteen concept (above), albeit likely in a scaled-down format.

[Source: Car and Driver]

C/D: Cadillac to get new range-topping rear-wheel-drive flagship originally appeared on Autoblog on Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:28:00 EST.

Report: General Motors wants to snuff out “Chevy” nickname [w/poll]

June 10th, 2010

Bowtie

Folks, there are bad ideas, and there ones that are legendary in their badness. Unfortunately for General Motors, it would appear that the automaker may very well be lobbying for its own wing in the Dumb Idea Hall of Fame. The New York Times reports that a memo distributed to workers at the company’s headquarters earlier this week instructs them to cease referring to the Chevrolet brand by its long-standing nickname, Chevy. Going forward, only Chevrolet is to be used. The reasoning? So-called branding consistency. If you’re thinking, “That’s insane,” well, we don’t blame you.

It gets better.

The Times further points out that the memo, signed by Chevy marketing vice president Jim Campbell (you see what we did there) and Alan Batey, VP of Chevy sales and service (there we go again), uses Coke – Coke – as an example of what GM is trying to achieve with this approach. It would seem that the powers-that-be at the RenCen are oblivious to the irony that Coke is, of course, shorthand for the company’s formal name, Coca-Cola.

In a nutshell, we feel that the Coke comparison GM uses in the memo is ultimately rather apt, given that the idea of memory-holing “Chevy” as part of some absurd branding exercise seems destined to be a failure on the level of New Coke. GM’s got its work cut out for itself, regardless. As of right now, Chevrolet.com has 5,480 “Chevy” mentions on it according to Google. GM.com? 1,730 more. That Chevy is inextricably tied to Chevrolet is a reality GM’s marketers are apparently divorced from.

We can’t be the only ones who think this is perhaps the very worst in a long history of horrible ideas… So, what’s your take? Hit the jump and have your say in our poll. Thanks to CpuYoda for the tip!

[Source: The New York Times]

Continue reading Report: General Motors wants to snuff out “Chevy” nickname [w/poll]

Report: General Motors wants to snuff out “Chevy” nickname [w/poll] originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:15:00 EST.

Saab working with Hirsch Performance on line of dealer-installed go-faster parts

June 2nd, 2010

2011 Saab 9-5 – Click above for high-res image gallery

Autoblog has learned that newly emancipated Saab is already looking to boost its enthusiast portfolio with higher-output engines and performance parts, albeit in a temporarily limited fashion. According to company sources, the Swedish automaker is seeking to enhance the performance potential of its 9-3 and the new 9-5, but it remains hamstrung by agreements signed with Saab’s previous owners that lay out chapter-and-verse about what power levels its products can offer through 2012. Why? Because “We can’t modify these licensed architectures in such a way that it will compete with General Motors products.” In other words, production-line models with stouter drivetrains have been ruled out for the next couple of years, leaving Saab to pursue other ways to bring more power to the people.

As such, company executives have been in talks with leading European Saab tuner Hirsch Performance AG (with whom it has a longstanding relationship) to develop new dealer-installed performance parts to be offered in North America and other markets. As Hirsch is not a well-known entity outside of Europe and diehard Saab enthusiasts, Saab has not yet decided under which name it will market these upgrades. However, these dealer-installed improvements could take the form of everything from ECU upgrades to aero kits, brakes, exhaust systems and other bolt-ons.

Discussions are ongoing, but names under discussion for the parts range include Hirsch, Saab Performance Group (SPG), as well as the Viggen moniker, both of which have been attached to high-performance Saab models in the past. It’s possible that different names will be adopted for different markets, leaving the door open for Hirsch in Europe and another designation in North America.

Gallery: 2010 Saab 9-5

Continue reading Saab working with Hirsch Performance on line of dealer-installed go-faster parts

Saab working with Hirsch Performance on line of dealer-installed go-faster parts originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:26:00 EST.

Bob Lutz retires from GM. Long live his influence

May 4th, 2010

Lutz3.jpg

It truly is the end of an era. Bob Lutz, the cocksure maverick who led a product renaissance at both General Motors and Chrysler, will retire effective May 1. When Lutz goes, the industry will lose one of its best car guys and a strong personality known as much for his gravelly pronouncements at auto shows as he was for the automobiles he helped create.

GM will surely miss his direction in the company’s new-car works. When Lutz arrived in September 2001, GM was putting out bland cars and cutting corners on all but its most-profitable pickup trucks and SUVs. Designers also took a back seat when the company set up to develop a new model. The company would engineer the underpinnings of a car, putting all considerations from engineering, manufacturing and marketing first. Then designers would wrap a steel body around it. The results were typically rote and boxy. When GM tried to step out with design, it ended up with cars like the famously garish Pontiac Aztek SUV.

Lutz brought design to the forefront. The company started its new cars with the styling concept first and then started to make changes for fuel economy, cabin space or aerodynamics or any other practical attribute. Stylists didn’t win every battle, but clearly design has improved immensely under Lutz’s reign. It took several years for Lutz’s overhaul to take hold. When it did, the results were much better cars that typically sold for thousands of dollars more than the old model they replaced. The current Cadillac CTS and Chevrolet Camaro have been critically praised. The Camaro has consistently outsold the rival Ford Mustang since its launch last year. GM has had to add production for the Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain SUVs.

Under Lutz, GM spent more cash to spruce up GM’s cabins, where the company’s finance-driven management team had often shaved budgets. Eric Noble, president of California auto consulting firm The CarLab, said the Malibu has nicer materials inside than a Toyota Camry. The Saturn Aura and Malibu won North American Car of the Year awards in 2007 and 2008.

Lutz also spearheaded the Chevrolet Volt program. The fruits of that work will come this fall when GM starts selling the car, which is engineered to run purely on electric power for 40 miles. Lutz had to make three passes at now-fired GM Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner to get an electric car approved.

Lutz wasn’t Mr. Green. This is a guy who flies his own jet fighter and has a passion for sports cars. He argued against government fuel economy rules and eschewed hybrid-electric cars until he saw the kind of marketing mileage Toyota was getting for its Prius. He famously declared Global Warming “a total crock.”

He also had some misreads when it came to the models he put out. The new GTO in 2004 was a cult favorite among gearheads, but the car was based on Australia’s Holden Monaro coupe and its jellybean styling looked dated. GM sold about 1,000 GTOs a month before ending production after three years. Remember the truck-nosed minivans? Lutz put an SUV face on the Chevy Uplander, Saturn Relay, Pontiac Montana and Buick Terrazza in 2005 and they, too, flopped. Lutz said at the time that it was a low-budget program. It was also bad badge engineering.

More recently, Lutz was overseeing marketing. He played a big role in the “May the Best Car Win” campaign that compared GM’s models to the best from Japan and Germany. It was audacious and showed that the company had confidence in the new cars Lutz and GM’s team had produced. GM still has a long way to go to convince some consumers to give its cars a look, but the campaign boosted showroom traffic.

Things changed in December. Whitacre and the board fired former CEO Fritz Henderson and later made Lutz an advisor. Lutz was dismayed at Henderson’s dismissal. Being an advisor with little authority didn’t suit his style, either. As Henderson told me today, Lutz “wants to be in the game.” At 78, Lutz has had a long run. If he isn’t having a major impact, he may as well kick back.

Someone has to pick up where he leaves off. Without Lutz to bring a product focus to GM, the company may surely be lost right now. Tom Stephens, GM’s vice chairman of global product operations, and GM-North America President Mark Reuss are the two men who will have to keep the car culture burning at GM, says Jim Hall. Lutz says he left a system in place to make sure it happens. And the two executives minding the car works have the sense to keep it going. Stephens is a car nut with an impressive collection of muscle cars and deep engineering knowledge. Reuss recently ran GM’s Holden business, where he had a big hand in developing the Camaro and beloved Pontiac G8 sports sedan. He is an engineer by training and has just the kind of expertise GM needs high up in management.

There may be tremendous pressure to return to old habits. Chairman and CEO Ed Whitacre is driven to boost sales, turn a profit and take GM public as soon as he can. That way the government can sell its 61% stake and GM can ditch the “Government Motors” moniker. But with that drive could come the pressure to shave costs to show potential investors a better bottom line. That isn’t to say Whitacre doesn’t believe in good products, though he has said little on the subject. But the company will have to resist the urge to pinch pennies. And management will do it without Lutz’s force of will. Hopefully for GM’s sake, the team he leaves behind will be able to do it.

GM pays back its loans and Whitacre stirs up some controversy

April 30th, 2010

You’d think that General Motors Chairman and CEO Ed Whitacre, who built AT&T with $200 billion worth of deals, would be a savvy poker player. Well, judging from the grousing over his recent television ad, in which he talks about paying off the government’s loans ahead of schedule, he may have overplayed his hand. Yes, GM paid off $8.4 billion in loans to the U.S. Treasury and the governments of Ontario and Canada about five years early. But crowing about it in a television commercial has generated some controversy.

You don’t have to go too far to find someone in the commentariat grousing about how GM paid back the loans. The gripe is that GM paid the debt portion of the government’s investment with cash the company got from the government’s equity investment. Here’s how it works. When GM emerged from bankruptcy, it got $49.5 billion in cash. The U.S. Treasury and governments of Ontario and Canada gave GM $8.4 billion in loans. The rest of the money was given to GM in exchange for stock. The U.S. government owns 61% of the company and Canada owns 11.7%. Back in July, the feds decided to give GM enough cash to get through a longer, deeper recession, according to a former member of President Obama’s Auto Task Force, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private. As the economy started to recover and auto sales have climbed, GM found it had more cash on hand than it needed. Repaying the government loans wasn’t such a hard thing to do. So when Whitacre goes on television saying “we have repaid our government loans, in full, with interest, five years ahead of the original schedule,” his comments raised a few hackles. “They were repaying Uncle Sam with money they already got from the government,” snapped Maryann Keller, an independent consultant in Stamford, Conn. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) weighed in during his weekly webcast calling Whitacre’s television appearance, “a little bit disingenuous.” He also said, “They’re paying it back with bailout money that they have from the federal government in the first place.”

To be fair, there is plenty of politics in play. Some critics simply didn’t like the bailout in the first place. The early payment is a small sign that GM’s business is getting back on track. If the company’s sales were tanking and cash flow was a problem, they’d keep all of the money until things turned around. GM’s sales are up 18.4% this year. GM-North America President Mark Reuss has done a commendable job of reining in incentive spending, giving GM better pricing on its cars. The company may turn at least an operating profit this year. So far, Whitacre and GM are doing many of the things they need to do to turn the business around.

The problem is that the early payoff shows only that GM is stable enough to give some money back. They aren’t making big profits yet. It’s one small benchmark on a longer haul. Going on television raised a hue and cry to a feat that some see as pretty marginal. There’s one other problem with Whitacre’s ad. He kicks it off by saying, “a lot of Americans didn’t agree with giving General Motors a second chance. Quite frankly, I can respect that.” Why would Whitacre want to remind Americans that the company needed to be bailed out? GM has a bit of momentum in the market. Vehicles like the Chevrolet Camaro, Buick Lacrosse sedan and Cadillac SRX and Chevy Equinox SUVs are red hot. Clearly, plenty of consumers are getting past the now-tired “Government Motors” tag and buying GM’s cars on their merits. If Ed goes on TV again, he might want to start with that.

Bob Lutz, 78, open to future career opportunities

April 20th, 2010

Filed under: ,

General Motors Vice Chairman Bob Lutz might be set to retire at the end of the month, but don’t expect him to go quietly into that good night – or take up the usual trappings that a man of his age and accomplishment might normally seek out. “I don’t play golf, never have never will. And secondly, I have no desire to go to Hilton Head, or Naples, Florida, or any place like that.”

Fair enough. So what’s in store for the auto industry icon? Well, he’s working on new business book, and there will be a supporting tour to follow its publication. Beyond that, he tells Autoblog that he’s going to be embarking on the lecture circuit with the Leigh Speakers Bureau and he might just be open to helping run another company – automotive or otherwise:

“I have had several approaches for board memberships of various companies and I’m going to be meeting with a headhunter who is a specialist in finding board members. He wants to see me, so we’ll see what comes up there. As far as GM is concerned, I have had numerous requests to continue to be available for advice and counsel and occasionally review design properties and stuff like that, so I’ll find a way to stay engaged.”

What about going to work for another carmaker? “Now, no other automobile company has yet approached me and said ‘Here’s a huge wad of money, come and work for us.’” We couldn’t resist a followup: “Is that an open invitation for that to happen?” Lutz laughed his trademark hoarse laugh and said wryly, “It depends on the size of the wad of money.”

Interested in hearing more Lutz gems? Check out the newest installment of the Autoblog Podcast, where the good chairman sits in with us for an hour-long career retrospective. We’ll have the complete show up for download or online listening available later this afternoon.

Bob Lutz, 78, open to future career opportunities originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:29:00 EST.

GM’s Whitacre writes to the troops. Profit may not be far off

April 13th, 2010

whitacre.jpg

General Motors Chairman and CEO Ed Whitacre has sent out his second memo in two weeks in an effort to make his rank-and-file staffers feel better about working at GM. In his latest note, sent out on April 12, Whitacre wrote to the staff that, “I anticipate solid operating results when we report our financials in May.” This follows a March 31 memo in which the media-shy Texan said that the major executive changes are already done. The current team will take GM forward, he wrote.

Whitacre didn’t say exactly what he means by “solid operating results.” Given his impatience for real results, I’d bet that means, at long last, some black ink. Consider a few facts. If you exclude $2.6 billion in costs for a union retiree healthcare fund, $400 million in currency losses and $100 million to wind down Saturn, GM lost just $300 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. During that same quarter, sales were down 24% in the U.S.

In the first quarter of this year, GM’s sales are up 18.4%. GM has some red-hot models, such as the Chevrolet Camaro pony car and Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain SUVs. The company is adding production for all three vehicles. The company is even boosting production for its full-sized Chevy Tahoe and GMC Yukon SUVs built in Arlington, Texas. Hey, I don’t know who wants those guzzlers, knowing that gasoline prices will rise again. But they are selling and GM will make a mint off of them while they are hot.

Don’t forget a couple other things. That healthcare trust that GM poured money into took over retiree medical benefits starting on Dec. 31. So you can trim those costs for the first quarter. Going forward, GM will also be able to hire new workers at half the pay of the assembly-line veterans. Throw in rising sales in Asia and South America, and GM might really have something. GM’s troubled European business will be drag on earnings until the company can get it fixed. But elsewhere, we are seeing the seeds of a turnaround. It all starts with a bit of black ink.